Please purchase comics and art from Peter Bagge. Editor’s note, transcribed from a series of voicemail recordings, accuracy limited, inaudible components marked with one period per 2 seconds of speech. Pauses in the message have been marked by new paragraphs.
Hi gorgeous, this is the entry I promised. I can’t get to a computer or fax machine, so apologies for the extra work. The chirality at issue here is not with the DNA, it never was. I’m not going to discuss left or right chirality because of the imposition problems, so instead I’ll just use clockwise versus counter-clockwise. I remember that you asked me not to do that, but I have no choice on this one because I am not a biologist and I want to be sure that my physics-centered analysis is useful to your mostly non-physics audience . . it doesn’t matter as long as you use silver . . no thank you, no lime, no ice, no salt . . . Milagro is perfect, thank you . . on the room please . . that’s kind of you, but just the drinks are fine . . . I’ll have one of those too, but please use tequila in mine instead of rum. . . . . No, the shot and the tequila mojito, so three drinks total; the shot, her regular mojito and my tequila mojito . . . yeah, and two waters . . . I apologize, yes, the seaweed crackers too then. Thank you.
It never was the DNA, that’s a correction to your Telex. To my knowledge the DNA is always a counter-clockwise, I believe the term for that is homochiral. The point here is that I never claimed this on DNA in the first place, and I don’t necessarily see the genetic engineering as even capable of changing the chirality of the DNA, or the RNA, which would include the Messenger RNA. And I’ve not raised any alarms to the chirality of the DNA or RNA as a whole, but rather to the chirality of the nucleotides. My limited knowledge of this is that clockwise chirality of the nucleotide leads to the torsion in the structure. And to that I have to add the correction from the Telex as well . . . thank you, not a Telex, it was a fax. I had an Eisenhower Administration moment there. Contrary to the fax, I didn’t mention Z-DNA, again the larger structure is completely out of my area of expertise. My experience in this area is the sugar, carbon and biopolymer structures close to the Kelvin barrier for water, say about fifteen nanometers.
With that, I think we’re back in the saddle here. To my knowledge the nucleotide growth does not exceed the Kelvin barrier, and it seems that the Kelvin barrier seems to both hold these structures to their relative linearity, and also allows for the genetic encoding. It was important to me to get this onto the tape, because I’m limited with my ability to communicate with biologists, and I’m not interested at this point in my life to change that. That’s the warning I meant in the .
We’re back? Excuse me one moment angel, I’m doing the phone recording thing again. . . . I’m okay with the sun, but if you want to move over to the shade, I’m okay with that too. . . that was the warning that I included last time, it was that I’m not going to bridge this gap from physics to biology with any great efficiency, but that biologists rarely study the surface energy effects of these structures near the Kelvin barrier. So for the part that concerns me, I’ll just note that it concerns me, I’m not going to use the word danger except for dangers in my lack of communication on this.
We know from the density functional analysis that the balance between adjacent nucleotides produces a torsional effect that we can measure in the RNA structure, and that’s the concern with the manufactured DNA to messenger RNA production. Unlike the DNA, the RNA has unbound nucleotides. So the concern about torsional impacts on a healthy DNA is outside of my area of expertise. I simply include the chirality of weakly-bound nucleotides. Again, it’s not the backbone, it’s the not the sides of the ladder, it’s the steps on the ladder. And that was what we found with the electron microscopy, we were able to modulate the chirality of those steps with surprisingly low input potential, in my opinion, input potentials that . . . . . with the input potentials common to the process of keying the mRNA to the functionalized proteins.
That’s to clarify the previous Telex. I think this is going to reach the time limit shortly, so I’m going to hang up and call back on a new tape.
We’re back! I know these are hard to transcribe, so I’ll try to wrap this up.
I am concerned about the chirality and surface energy of unbound nucleotides because of what I’ve measured and others have measured. The current death count seems to have stabilized at a bit less than four million, the World Health Organization has now admitted to their mistake of ruling out the lab leak, we’re about halfway through the ninety-day White House discovery, and the news I’ve seen so far on my feed is that the so-called “Biden officials” have gradually leaned toward lab leak. From a purely temporal distribution, four million should be the cap, the torsional impacts on the mutated structures should even themselves out with time, and likely lower the infectious nature of the engineered coronavirus back toward natural harmlessness. It’s the torsional energy itself that dissipates through the mutations, that’s not so much biological as much as straight up classical electrodynamics of that structure evening out its energy. My concern from several months ago was the mRNA vaccine, because unlike a lab leak, that vaccine is fully regulated by the Food and Drug Administration, with each subsequent casting of chain identical to the first. That’s one of the lessons we learned from all those babies that were mangled from the Thalidomide disaster, we can’t let the laboratory conditions of manufacture change the macromolecule structure with dislocations or chirality shifts.
But in this case, the manufactured rigidity of the functionalized mRNA is going to hold those torsional imbalances for the life of the vaccine. The only thing they can do at this point without refunctionalization is to decrease or increase the dosages.
We did not apparently dodge a bullet with the genetic-engineered enhancement on the coronavirus itself. The desire to test these methods on coronaviruses rather than flu viruses, probably saved tens of millions of lives, even a genetically-engineered coronavirus is going to be far less deadly than a genetically-engineered flu virus, assuming population impaction to be similar. That particular GMO apparently led to some four million deaths, and I think this is going to be as far as it goes, because Mother Nature tends to pull potential energy from high torsions and place that energy into adjacent lower torsions. But that process cannot happen with the mRNA vaccine because each batch is manufactured fresh at the enhanced-potential.
Of course, none of this actually matters. If . . .
The best laid plans of mice and men, huh? Where was I? Undesired impacts from the mRNA vaccine can be added to the lab leak disease itself, because the envelope is poorly defined and I believe the only human control groups are specifically not part of the study. We will have reasonable records on gestational birth defects however, because the numbers on those are not subject to weak definitions. While a raft of birth defects from chirality distortions may in fact lead to a greatly revised public policy on these vaccines, I think it would take an impact density in fact equal to or greater than Thalidomide to get traction. And of course, if we’re lucky we’ll dodge that bullet and see low correlation to vaccinations and birth defects, or hopefully even near-zero correlation. The reality though is that Francis Oldham Kelsey is no longer alive, and it seems there are few to match her focus and critique over the current process. But the clock is ticking, we’re going to get some actual data on the impact to newborns by about January twenty-twenty-two. The gestational drip should peak by about July twenty-twenty-two. But fingers crossed that we see near zero correlation.
Lessee, all items checked. For the music, I think Junior Brown is still alive, maybe that one where you and I danced at that outdoor patio? I miss you Cass, I love you.